Starting on April 3, French Prime Minister Gabriel Attal will embark on a novel parliamentary journey, personally responding to MPs’ inquiries during a newly formatted session at the Assemblée Nationale. This change, designed to revitalize engagement and dialogue within the government’s questioning sessions, draws inspiration from the House of Commons in the United Kingdom. Attal, standing alone for 45 minutes, will tackle 10 questions, allowing a direct line of communication between the nation’s representatives and the Prime Minister.Revolutionizing Parliamentary InteractionsHistorically, the French Parliament’s question time has struggled to captivate both lawmakers and the public, leading to sparse attendance and waning interest. This innovative approach, spearheaded by Assemblée President Yaël Braun-Pivet, aims to inject vitality and relevance into these sessions. Critics, however, express concerns over the potential diminishment of technical inquiry depth and the overshadowing of ministerial responsibilities. Yet, proponents argue this format will enhance political discourse and respect towards parliamentary members by broadening the scope of engagement.Diverse Reactions from Political SpectrumThe response to this parliamentary experiment diverges sharply among political groups. Left-wing factions and some allies within President Macron’s circle voice apprehension, fearing a reduction in substantive debate and an undue focus on the Prime Minister. Conversely, supporters, including the right-wing Les Républicains and the far-right Rassemblement National, applaud the initiative for its potential to reinvigorate parliamentary sessions and ensure more inclusive participation. This disagreement underscores the broader debate over the balance between political spectacle and substantive governance.Looking Towards a New Parliamentary EraAs France stands on the cusp of this parliamentary evolution, the success of this experiment remains to be seen. Will this Westminster-inspired format foster a more dynamic and engaging legislative process, or will it veer towards surface-level political theater, leaving intricate policy discussions by the wayside? This bold move by the Assemblée Nationale not only signifies a shift in French political culture but also poses a critical inquiry into the nature of democratic engagement and the role of leadership within it.